🔗 Share this article

Getty Images

Donald Trump this week authorized an presidential directive pledging to employ every means - involving the US military - to secure the Gulf state of Qatar.

The document declares that Washington will regard any hostile action on the tiny resource-abundant nation as a risk to the US itself and will "utilize all permissible and fitting steps - encompassing statecraft, monetary, and as needed, defense - to defend the interests of the America and of the Qatari nation and to bring back peace and stability".

The order constitutes an unprecedented protection treaty between the US and a significant Middle Eastern partner, almost mirroring aspects of a international defense coalition. It will be the desire of its neighboring countries.

It's even more remarkable taking into account how Qatar has transitioned in just a few years from being the target of an economic and diplomatic boycott by its neighbouring nations to now becoming the Middle East's mediation center - lately in its role as mediator between Tel Aviv and Hamas.

Hamas has its political offices in the Qatari capital and is presently assessing Trump's detailed conflict resolution initiative announced at the White House on at the beginning of the week. Doha is also host to the area's most significant American military installation, the strategic airbase.

This decision to formalize American defense for Qatar comes after the rage expressed by the ruling Al Thani family last month after Israeli airstrikes on their land targeted Hamas leaders, resulting in numerous junior operatives of the group deceased along with a local protection officer.

Qatar was also struck by Tehran previously in retaliation for US attacks against its uranium enrichment plants.

The state is at the center of expanding unease among Middle Eastern countries that partnering with the United States and accommodating its defense facilities is not providing them the protection they had assumed.

Security cameras record moment of military strike on Palestinian officials in the Qatari capital

Qatar's foreign ministry positively welcomed the presidential directive declaring it represented "a crucial development in strengthening the mutual tight military alliance".

But this decision brings up important questions over its timeline and motivation, and it is likely to be questioned in Washington.

It lays down a standard influencing the unstable and explosive Middle East relations just as Gaza's ruling faction reviews Trump's proposal for the Gaza's coming days.

Former American diplomat to the Israeli state a diplomatic official indicated Trump was awarding Qatar an extraordinary benefit before appearing to get commitments from the Qatari government in exchange.

"This protection agreement to Qatar appears illogical unless they provide a positive response from Gaza's rulers, or remove them if they refuse," commented the experienced official.

The Israeli newspaper a leading daily encapsulated what is expected to be the perception in the Jewish nation: "Donald Trump offered security to Palestinian officials when living in Qatar, regardless of the Prime Minister's admonition that they would not be safe in any location."

But regional specialists state this security pledge is vital to stabilize a nervous area, disturbed by Tel Aviv's escalating armed intervention beyond its borders coupled with wider worries about the trustworthiness of the American protection in the Arabian Gulf.

An expert commentator from the consulting firm said this decision went "some way" to comfort Qatar and additional Middle Eastern partners, stating that he expected the Kingdom to seek a similar pledge. "I do think it's significantly in the American benefit to keep them onside," the expert informed news organizations.

The extent of the security guarantee for Qatar is wide-ranging, including US military backing in the event it is attacked. In that aspect it is comparable with Nato's Article 5 necessitating a joint response for an hostile action against any individual ally.

But being released as an official decree from the White House, it avoids Congress, which under the defense legislation should be consulted by the commander-in-chief before engaging United States military.

That means the directive might be without binding power and could conceivably be modified or abandoned under a different leadership. It is also probable to face review from opposition party members in the legislature.

The move is also being challenged by sections of Trump's own Maga support base who consider it contrary to his "national priority" policy.

A political activist, an prominent far-right advocate close to the President, suggested Qatar was rather a danger than ally to the United States.

The pro-Trump commentator Mark Levin said the decree overturned the United States' conventional partnerships in the area, questioning: "Should the administration of Gaza's rulers in Qatar is eliminated by the Israeli government, are we engaging militarily with the Jewish nation?"

Additionally the issue of the President's relatives' private and commercial connections to Qatar, which his critics say constitute a ethical concern in his diplomatic engagements with the affluent Gulf state.

The family business, operated by his children the younger Trumps, concluded a arrangement in {April|spring|